I just posted about being cautioned not to invest in companies involved in this litigation and how the likelihood of investing just wasn't a concern, but what wasn't mentioned in that caution was the possibility of having a much better idea of the whole based on the combination of newspaper articles and document review gleanings.
I always read articles related to companies involved in the review, as well as previous reviews. It's fun to learn the outcome of a case later on. In this case, there are a lot of changes and some strife within the industry. Because we're familiar with other corporations involved in the industry, the Business section, especially of the New York Times, can be fun to read. Every day there's something that makes more sense to me than it should.
Friday, October 24, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment